ISO, R2 and NAID AAA Alignment

This page explains how AutoKeyboard and AutoWipe can align with certified operations and support compliance evidence, without claiming software-only certification.

Important: AutoKeyboard and AutoWipe can support controls, records, and repeatable execution. They do not, by themselves, grant ISO, R2, or NAID AAA certification.

For organizations that already hold certifications, these tools can be deployed in ways that align with those schemes and do not inherently conflict with them.

How this aligns and does not inherently break each scheme

ISO 9001 (Quality Management)

Aligns by standardizing repeatable steps, reducing operator-to-operator variation.
Supports objective evidence through per-device records and repeatable outputs.
Does not inherently conflict when workflows are version-controlled and approved under your QMS.

ISO 14001 (Environmental Management)

Aligns by improving reuse decision quality through verified processing records.
Supports traceability for downstream handling and disposition documentation.
Does not inherently conflict when used inside your defined environmental controls and legal obligations.

ISO 27001 (Information Security)

Aligns by supporting consistent sanitization execution and evidence retention.
Supports asset traceability with serial-linked records and verification outcomes.
Does not inherently conflict when access control, logging protection, and change management are enforced.

ISO 45001 / AS4801 (Health and Safety)

Aligns by reducing repetitive manual input and supporting repeatable safe work methods.
Supports clearer operating discipline through consistent sequence execution.
Does not inherently conflict when included in risk assessments, SOPs, and worker training.

AS/NZS 5377 (E-waste and Reuse)

Aligns by providing device-level evidence to support reuse, resale, or further processing.
Supports documented chain-of-process evidence for downstream handling.
Does not inherently conflict when integrated with your documented e-waste controls.

R2 and NAID AAA

Aligns by producing repeatable sanitization evidence and per-asset reporting.
Supports auditor-ready records when procedures, roles, and approvals are documented.
Does not inherently conflict when operated within controlled chain-of-custody and verification procedures.

Ways this can break compliance if misused

Using unapproved or changed workflows without document control/change approval.
Failing to protect logs/certificates from tampering, loss, or unauthorized deletion.
Running wipes without validated verification criteria or not reviewing failed outcomes.
Allowing shared accounts or weak access controls on systems generating compliance evidence.
Skipping operator training/competency checks for the automated process.
Treating automation output as final truth without internal QA sampling and exception handling.
Not linking records to asset identity/chain-of-custody where certification requires traceability.
Claiming software use alone equals certification without full management system conformance.

Bottom line: the tools are compliance enablers, not replacements for your management system. Non-conformance risk comes from governance, access, training, traceability, or validation gaps around the tools.